Feedback by UserVoice

Charley Kyd

My feedback

  1. 244 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Charley Kyd supported this idea  · 
  2. 106 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Charley Kyd supported this idea  · 
  3. 260 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Charley Kyd supported this idea  · 
  4. 11 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Charley Kyd supported this idea  · 
  5. 65 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Charley Kyd supported this idea  · 
  6. 37 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Charley Kyd supported this idea  · 
  7. 237 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Charley Kyd supported this idea  · 
  8. 573 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Charley Kyd supported this idea  · 
  9. 17 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Charley Kyd commented  · 

    Although DAX Studio does this...

    ...It's a multi-step manual process. But PQ could allow the process to be part of a query...sort of a Table.Buffer on steroids.

    ...I suspect that most companies allow only a small list of add-ins to be installed.

    ...It requires the use of Power Pivot, which also should have this feature.

    Charley Kyd supported this idea  · 
  10. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Excel for Windows (Desktop Application) » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Charley Kyd shared this idea  · 
  11. 141 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Charley Kyd supported this idea  · 
  12. 12 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Charley Kyd shared this idea  · 
  13. 1,276 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Thanks for the support and the detailed discussion around this suggestion. We understand that there are some advantages and disadvantages with both MDI (multi-document interface) and SDI (single-document interface), and we currently do not have plans to revert to MDI. We do want to improve the experience with SDI so you can get your work done efficiently, and this post has helped toward that goal.

    Some of the specific issues mentioned are addressed as follows:
    – Stability: This has been a focus over the past several years, and the monthly releases in 2020 have been among the most reliable ever in terms of avoiding crashes.
    - Screen space – while it won’t get all the space back, you can minimize the ribbon to save some space. It only shows when needed.
    - Navigation between workbooks: you can use CTRL+F6, SHIFT+CTRL+F6, CTRL+TAB or SHIFT+CTRL+TAB to switch to the next workbook. …

    Charley Kyd supported this idea  · 
  14. 43 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Charley Kyd supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Charley Kyd commented  · 

    Negative date-time values currently have no meaning. It would be easy to use those values to cover ALL dates prior to 1900. With the right approach, astronomers, geologists, paleontologists, historians, genealogists, and so on, could use dates prior to 1900. To do so, however, we’d lose the ability to work with the time of day prior to 1900.

    The scaling would take some thought to define. The Gregorian dates could go back, perhaps, to Monday, Jan 1, 4713 B.C...the beginning of the Julian calendar. Further back, there’d be a span where only years were tracked. And then centuries, and so on.

    This adjusted scaling makes sense, because, for example, the K-T event happened about 65.5 million years ago. But no one will ever be able to say (or want to) that it happened on Tuesday, May 16, 65487 BC at 2:49 am, GMT.

    And also, along the way, there's be a function that could convert between Gregorian and Julian dates.

  15. 75 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Charley Kyd shared this idea  · 
  16. 21 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Charley Kyd commented  · 

    I agree! If we want to return text from a Table, MATCHIFS would provide an easy way to do it.

    I know, there are workarounds. But they shouldn't be needed. Instead, we need MATCHIFS.

    Charley Kyd supported this idea  · 
  17. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Thanks for the feedback. This is an interesting idea. We’ll consider this in our future planning. Please continue to vote on this feature idea.

    Thanks,
    Scott [MSFT]

    Charley Kyd supported this idea  · 
  18. 70 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    This is great feedback. We are looking into the details of this. Please continue to vote on feature ideas which will increase their likelihood of getting in the product.

    Thanks,
    Scott [MSFT]

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Charley Kyd commented  · 

    This should be a setting that affects the upper and lower bounds of the chart. That way, as the data changes, the bounds adjust automatically to apply the zoom setting.

  19. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Charley Kyd shared this idea  · 
  20. 31 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Interesting idea. Thanks for the feedback. We’ll consider this in our future planning. Please continue to vote on this feature idea.

    Thanks,
    Scott [MSFT]

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Charley Kyd commented  · 

    And also, enhance that feature so we can save the image easily in VBA!!!

← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base