Feedback by UserVoice

Roger Govier

My feedback

  1. 30 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Roger Govier supported this idea  · 
  2. 27 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Roger Govier commented  · 

    Great idea and much needed. Look forward to seeing this released.

    Roger Govier supported this idea  · 
  3. 244 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Roger Govier supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Roger Govier commented  · 

    This would be a great addition

  4. 74 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Roger Govier supported this idea  · 
  5. 106 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Roger Govier supported this idea  · 
  6. 260 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Roger Govier supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Roger Govier commented  · 

    Excellent idea Charles and I have tested your own functions that you have already written which work perfectly.
    However, I think it would be even more useful if there was a way to pass an optional array to the function to excluded certain columns otherwise you end up summing dates and unit prices etc., which is neither use to man nor beast.
    e.g. =SUMCOLS(E7#,{1:6,9}) which would exclude summing the first 6 columns and the 9th for example.

  7. 20 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Roger Govier supported this idea  · 
  8. 65 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Roger Govier supported this idea  · 
  9. 141 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Roger Govier supported this idea  · 
  10. 8 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Roger Govier supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Roger Govier commented  · 

    Great idea

  11. 15 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Roger Govier supported this idea  · 
  12. 12 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Roger Govier supported this idea  · 
  13. 92 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Roger Govier shared this idea  · 
  14. 40 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Roger Govier supported this idea  · 
  15. 6,624 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Wow.

    Thank you to all those participated in our survey. What an amazing number of responses, many of them with very deep content. We’re processing the over ten thousand responses(!), and already appreciate the time so many of you took to answer with passion and experience.

    Please know this survey is used to help influence various topics – both on Python as well as other related topics that the comments started to bleed into. Given the passion, I want to be clear this remains an area of exploration for us, without any specific timeline.

    We’ll provide updates as we progress on this feature request.

    Thanks!

    Ashvini Sharma
    Lead Program Manager
    Excel

    Roger Govier supported this idea  · 
  16. 15 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Roger Govier supported this idea  · 
  17. 1,112 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Huge progress update toward historical data! We have released our preview of the StockHistory function! https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/stockhistory-function-1ac8b5b3-5f62-4d94-8ab8-7504ec7239a8

    However, this is only available to our Beta Channel at the moment, so when it is rolled out to General Availability, I will be sure to update the status to completed.

    If you are able to use the feature in preview and have feedback, please send-a-frown for us to review.

    —Kaycee Reineke
    Excel PM

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Roger Govier commented  · 

    Quite agree. This is a much needed feature

    Roger Govier supported this idea  · 
  18. 1,422 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Thanks for logging this great suggestion, Zack, and to others for voting it up. We’ll prioritize this according to the number of votes, so if there’s more interest, please make sure to register your vote!

    Thanks

    Ashvini Sharma
    Lead Program Manager
    Excel

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Roger Govier commented  · 

    Just used my last vote on this.
    Equally, if there is a Total row in a table, it has to be removed before entering more data else the table will not automatically expand.
    I have made the suggestion before to Microsoft to have a switch allowing Totals to be placed above the header row ( a much more logical place as Totals would always be in view), if required, and then table extension would happen automatically.

    Roger Govier supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Roger Govier commented  · 

    I'm out of votes but agree completely with Doug on this.
    Equally, if there is a Total row in a table, it has to be removed before entering more data else the table will not automatically expand.
    I have made the suggestion before to Microsoft to have a switch allowing Totals to be placed above the header row ( a much more logical place as Totals would always be in view), if require, and then table extension would happen automatically.

  19. 11 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Roger Govier supported this idea  · 
  20. 129 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Roger Govier supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base