IP Address as a datatype.
I would love to see IP Addresses added as a format option and functions added for validation of the IP addresses..
For instance InSubnet(Network as IP,Netmask as Integer,address as IP) to determine if an IP is within a Subnet;
Being able to do addition/subtraction on the field would be awesome as well!
Thanks for the suggestion Alex, and thanks to those that making their vote heard. This is a pretty interesting ask – take a look at the comment I made. I’d like us to understand a few related things. And as always, please keep voting for the things you care about most.
John [MS XL]
Aaron Ricci commented
Michael Daughety commented
Add IPv6 to this request as well!
Please this is much needed.
Jeremy Murray commented
Terry Tusher commented
Why isn't this already done MS! Throw us a bone here.
Yes, please. The ability to sort correctly would be MUCH appreciated too.
mike westkamper commented
I posted here years ago, and IP addresses as a datatype still isn't something M$ will do. I did find this however:
They work and are quite useful.
All was already said in this thread. I just fully support other folks.
This would be soooooo useful! I spend hours of my day maintaining spreadsheets of ipv4 addresses. Just to be able to sort them correctly would be huge.
Alan Bolster commented
Please make this happen!
100% Yes, please!
So much time saved.
YES!! If I could put in a subnet in CIDR notation, and be able to autofill... OMG, do you have any idea how much time that would save me!!?? Meaning... if I type in something like 192.168.1.0/26, and then autofill down, it would fill in 192.168.1.64/26 in the next cell, 192.168.1.128/26 in the following, and so on. That would make the daunting task of planning and documenting your network so much easier!
Joe Poole commented
In this day and age, everything is connected and has an IP Address. IT staff everywhere could use IP Address formats and functions. I am surprised we have to ask for this ability. You would think a technology giant like Microsoft would be just a little bit more in tune with IT needs.
Bill Haughton commented
I absolutely support IP-V4 address support, and within a year after, IP.V6 support.
It's amazed me that IP.V4 addressing has not been included thus far. Granted, it may be a somewhat selective audience, but a critical one, that keeps your networks running ! ! ! ! !
Rob Clive commented
This would be handy
Yes to more data types!!!!!!! I'm sure the consumer goods industry would love you forever if UPCs/GTINs were also a data type.
In format cells, you could try using "000.000.000.000,,," as an option. It's not perfect, but works fine if all the octets are with 3 numbers (192.168.128.100).
Jaime Castells commented
The ability to sort by IP and/or subnet in CIDR notation as well as perform logical tests between IP values, IP and CIDR or multiple CIDRs would be a relief. I have a number of hoops I keep at hand so I can jump through them. It's time consuming and the results are rarely more than passable.
PLEASE add my vote to this list.
Łukasz Rutkowski commented
YES YES YES! AND BE ABLE TO SORT IT Ascending and Descending! That would be AWESOME!
Steve May commented
I would too.